Europol Litigation — CJEU Data Rights Enforcement
When Europol fails to respect your data rights and EDPS remedies are insufficient, litigation before the Court of Justice of the European Union is available. Our lawyers prepare and conduct CJEU proceedings to enforce your rights under EU Regulation 2016/794.

When Is Litigation Necessary?
Litigation before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) is the ultimate remedy for individuals whose Europol data rights have been violated and who have been unable to obtain redress through Europol’s internal processes or via the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS).
Article 43 of EU Regulation 2016/794 provides that any data subject who has suffered damage as a result of Europol’s unlawful data processing may bring an action before the CJEU. The CJEU has jurisdiction to award damages and to issue orders requiring Europol to take specific actions — including deletion of data, restriction of processing, and cessation of unlawful transfers.
CJEU proceedings are complex, expensive, and time-consuming — and are generally reserved for cases where the legal arguments are strong, the harm is significant and documented, and other remedies have been exhausted or are clearly inadequate. Our lawyers assess each case carefully before recommending the litigation route.
Grounds for CJEU Action Against Europol
CJEU proceedings against Europol may be appropriate where:
- Europol has systematically refused to comply with access or deletion requests without adequate legal justification
- The EDPS has issued a decision favourable to the complainant but Europol has failed to implement it
- Europol data processing has caused documented financial, reputational, or personal harm
- Europol has transferred data to a third country in violation of Article 25, resulting in serious consequences for the individual
- Europol’s refusal to provide access is itself unlawful — for example, where the claimed exception (ongoing investigation) does not apply
- The volume, nature, or duration of Europol’s data processing constitutes a disproportionate interference with fundamental rights under the EU Charter
The CJEU Proceedings Process
Proceedings before the CJEU are initiated by filing an application (requête) with the Court Registry. The application must set out the facts, the legal basis for the claim, and the remedy sought. Europol then has the opportunity to respond, and both parties may file pleadings before the Court schedules a hearing.
CJEU proceedings in data protection matters typically take eighteen months to three years from initiation to judgment. The Court may award damages, issue declaratory relief, or order Europol to take specific remedial action. Critically, CJEU judgments are binding and enforceable against EU institutions.
Our firm works with CJEU-experienced counsel to prepare and conduct these proceedings. We provide full legal support from pre-litigation strategy through to judgment and enforcement.
Interim Relief and Urgent Applications
In urgent cases — where Europol data is causing immediate and serious harm — it is possible to seek interim measures from the CJEU, including an order requiring Europol to suspend specific data processing activities while proceedings are ongoing. Interim measures applications are assessed on urgency and the balance of interests.
We advise clients on whether interim relief is appropriate and, where it is, prepare and file the necessary applications on an expedited basis. In our experience, the threat of credible interim relief proceedings often produces constructive engagement from Europol at the administrative level — potentially resolving the matter without full litigation.
Seek Justice — Act Now
Challenge Europol at the Court of Justice of the EU
When administrative remedies fail, the CJEU offers the highest level of legal protection against Europol. Our lawyers have experience representing clients in EU court proceedings against law enforcement bodies.
Strict confidentiality · No obligation

Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need to exhaust EDPS remedies before going to the CJEU?
No. Article 43 of the Europol Regulation allows direct access to the CJEU without exhausting EDPS remedies first. However, in practice, pursuing EDPS remedies first is often more efficient and provides a stronger evidentiary basis for any subsequent CJEU proceedings.
Can I recover damages from Europol in CJEU proceedings?
Yes. Article 43 provides for liability in damages where Europol’s unlawful data processing has caused harm. The standard for establishing liability is based on EU institutional liability principles — requiring proof of unlawful conduct, actual harm, and a causal link between the two.
How much does CJEU litigation cost?
CJEU proceedings involve significant legal costs, including Court fees, counsel fees, and translation costs. We advise on cost-benefit analysis before recommending this route. In appropriate cases, conditional fee or hybrid fee arrangements may be available.
What is the difference between the EDPS and the CJEU?
The EDPS is a supervisory authority with administrative powers — it investigates complaints and can order Europol to take corrective action. The CJEU is a court with judicial powers — it can issue binding judgments, award damages, and enforce compliance. EDPS decisions can be challenged before the CJEU. The two remedies can be pursued in parallel.
Our Practice Areas
Related Services
Data Access Request
Find out what data Europol holds about you
Data Deletion Request
Challenge and remove unlawful Europol data
EDPS Complaint
Escalate to the EU Data Protection Supervisor
Third-Country Transfer
Stop unlawful Europol data sharing abroad
Preventive Data Check
Verify your Europol status before problems arise
World-Check Removal
Remove your listing from risk screening databases