Lexisnexis Worldcheck Removal

Yes, and this is one of the most common problems we encounter. World-Check may retain historical data unless actively challenged, meaning acquittals, case dismissals, and withdrawn charges often remain visible to screening institutions. Screening providers often argue that the historical fact of proceedings remains accurate even if the outcome was favourable. Successfully removing such entries […]

LexisNexis may reject initial erasure requests, particularly for sanctions-related or PEP listings. When this occurs, the next step is lodging a formal complaint with the relevant data protection authority — for example, the UK ICO for data processed under UK GDPR. Regulatory complaints can take several months to assess. If the regulator finds in your […]

Yes. Adverse media screening is a core component of World-Check’s methodology, and listings based purely on press coverage — without any criminal charges, regulatory findings, or court proceedings — are common. However, such listings are legally vulnerable under GDPR because they often fail accuracy requirements and lack a proportionate legal basis for processing. Successful challenges […]

Straightforward cases involving clearly outdated information or resolved criminal matters can achieve removal within 2–4 months through direct engagement with the database provider. Complex cases — particularly those involving ongoing sanctions designations, active PEP status, or disputed source material — typically require 6–12 months, especially if regulatory escalation becomes necessary. Cases requiring simultaneous Interpol CCF […]

Yes. Under GDPR Article 15, you have the right to submit a Subject Access Request directly to LSEG (London Stock Exchange Group), which operates World-Check; a response is generally due within one month, extendable in certain cases. The response will disclose your full profile, including risk categories assigned, source citations, and processing history. Where relevant, […]